*** RYAN TATE: Shocking secrets--revealed! ***
Reporter

Articles

Resume

Professional bio

Media appearences



Personal

Pictures (older pictures)

Weblog archive



Contact info
ryantate@ryantate.com

RSS feed

PGP key

415.640.6119 mobile

415.288.4968 office

AIM: ryantatedotcom



Recent San Francisco Business Times stories

Oakland mayor criticizes candidate Dellums' economic plan (Web) (June 1)

Biofuel strikes oil in eateries (May 26)

Cleanfish: Hooking finicky gourmands (May 26)

More Oakland cops may walk downtown beat (May 19)

D.R. Horton plants flag in Oakland (May 12)

Developers, candidates see different worlds (May 19)

Chief becomes focus as fear of lawlessness rises (May 19)

Lennar scraps Oakland housing deal (May 5)

Oakland condo developer snares offices (May 5)

Dropoff in condo sales means likely price cuts (April 28, 2006)

High hopes: 63-story Oakland tower (April 21, 2006)



Recent personal essays

Private property (Oct. 8)



Blogs I read

Anne and her Cheese Diaries

Guy

Norman

Owen

David Warsh

Dave Winer

Jim Romenesko

Philip Greenspun

Joel Spolsky



Published using Blogger.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006


A well-informed reader explained why FedEx refuses to guarantee the safe delivery of items over $500, as I wrote on Saturday. The explanation is lengthy, legalistic and involves something called released valuation doctrine, but what it boils down to is this:

1. FedEx and UPS receive special legal protection that makes it cheap and efficient for them to insure your package up to that $500 threshold but insane to assume any liability beyond that point. This is because they are "common carriers," and roughly 70 years ago the federal government decided they should be shielded from potential liabilities while having a reasonable mechanism to offer a modicum of coverage up to certain limits.

2. Going beyond the $500 limit is possible, because FedEx could sell insurance provided by another company without waiving its special federal liability protection. But doing so is legally delicate, in part because FedEx would have to become a licensed broker of insurance in each state and comply with local insurance regulations.

It is highly likely the online retailer who shipped my package FedEx but wanted it returned via U.S. Postal Service insured registed mail has an insurance policy on its FedEx packages through a company other than FedEx. Obviously it would be onerous for me to acquire such a policy, especially sinced FedEx does not sell it directly, so I was directed to USPS.

I am glad I now understand why I can't return products bought online without waiting at the Post Office and wrapping with paper tape. Unfortunately, this does not make me any happier about the situation.


Back home



Published by Ryan Tate, ryantate@ryantate.com.